20081228, 10:27  #1 
Nov 2008
2×3^{3}×43 Posts 
ECM efforts mistake?
On the Base 10 Still Open Home Primes page, the ECM effort on step 85 of HP845 is reported as 1000 curves with B1 = 11e9 by rogue. 1 curve at 11e9 takes a very long time, so how long would 1000 take? Moreover, these curves are optimal for around 75 digits and the number is only 139 digits. Surely this is a typo for 11e6.

20081228, 13:31  #2  
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2^{2}·5·17·19 Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Recommended bases and efforts  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  184  20211124 05:47 
Cunningham ECM efforts  pinhodecarlos  Cunningham Tables  7  20171221 13:29 
Doublecheck efforts; S66/S79 to start with  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  16  20140807 02:11 
ECM Efforts  R.D. Silverman  Factoring  63  20050624 13:41 
A very simple mistake...  Vijay  Programming  6  20050409 11:39 